gets my vote for funniest blog entry heading this week.
Read it all here:
Kubla Kong
I'm down with J.C. and all His Good Works, but what up with the Catholics saying they're going to pull all human services in D.C. if the marriage thing passes...that they're going to starve the homeless (gay, straight, bi, asexual) just to make a political point?
What do they think J.C. would do if He came back to Earth and saw them doing that.
I think it would be some sort of special effect otherworldly laser aimed at the Vatican that would make the movie 2012 look tame by comparison.
It would be "Eggs Benedict" in the Vatican probably.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Thank you, William. I guess if Jesus kicked off his career in miracles at a wedding in Cana, a wedding in DC could mark the limits of his purported followers' compassion. Until somebody identifies (with 100% certainty) a queer fetus, no gay will find love in the Vatican--and even then, I suspect it would be the same hard knocks once the kid is born. Fetuses are like the newly departed--you can say and think nice things about them because you're basically just fantasizing about who they are/were/will be anyway. It's much harder for Christ's spokesmen to be loving to living, breathing human beings, especially those who are also fucking.
Hehe Joe,
I will confess something to you (you are now my Confessor).
I am in a fascination phase with Catholicism. I watch EWTN fairly constantly, even telecommute to Mass there.
I love the stories about the saints and being OCD the OCD rituals synch up with my mind.
I am fasciniated with how they try to mask hate when it emerges.
I am fascinated by the constant explanation of doctrine and dogma, and the defenses of things like Purgatory and Indulgences, which clearly bother even the explainers while they are explaining them...
The thing I don't get is why they can't have enough respect for the God they claim to Love to just let him sort us all out...and it's strange to me that they find gay sex so threatening when in Heaven sex is over, kaput, nobody's gay straight anything...according to dogma...
But then I guess they think they're saving people from the fires of Hell by stopping the gayness. But is that even a mortal sin in se to them? I guess I don't know enough of the dogma yet.
But if it's not a mortal sin and it's just more regular earthly sin to them, why be so threatened by it?
The only logical answer is that they believe it is the future (which it almost certainly is) and if they can't compromise with the future then they will demographically suffer even more than they already have.
I mean, it isn't like they haven't compromised repeatedly, century after century.
So do I believe there will come a day when gay weddings are performed in the Vatican and blessed by the Pope?
I'd have to say yes.
If it truly is The Corporation which it seems to view itself as.
Maybe three hundred years.
But yes.
Or it might just be a casino by then.
I don't know.
I wish Jesus Christ would come back for just one day and hold a press conference and give some great clarifications.
He could prefix it by saying, "First off, I want everybody to realize THIS IS NOT THE SECOND COMING...I just had to come down here and explain some shit because you people are really getting some of my thoughts FUCKED UP!! You know, who you are. I won't mention any names but many of you are wearing pointy hats right now...."
And then he could say at the end of the conference...I'll take some questions, but only a couple...
And some douche in the audience would probably waste a great opportunity by asking, "Mel Gibson. Yes or no at this point?"
Post a Comment